Nevin's Data "Points"

A recent Wall Street Journal (WSJ) article asked what I view as a rhetorical question; “Do you really know what’s inside your 401(k)?” Rhetorical in that I suspect the answer from most people — certainly if they’re honest — is “no.” Now there are many aspects to a 401(k) that bear scrutiny, but the  article  was focused on target-date funds (TDFs) — a mechanism that I think has been a boon for most of the novice investors (and savers) that I suspect most 401(k) participants (still) are. You check one box (heck, these days that box is checked for you) and tap into the expertise — and ongoing expertise at that — of professional money managers to provide your retirement savings with a diversified portfolio mix. No longer do you have to concern yourself with weightings of stocks and bonds, value versus growth, domestic versus international — just leave it to the experts.  But the WSJ article’s focus was a cautionary note — mostly concerned at the unexpected things that a coll...

   There’s a “new” retirement crisis to fret about — and it involves so-called “junk” IRAs. You may have seen the recent Wall Street Journal’s headline that proclaimed “ Forgotten 401(k) Accounts Are Costing Americans Billions in Lost Investment Gains .” This particular assertion turns out to be another spurred by (yet another) proclamation from an IRA provider (PensionBee), though this one at least doesn’t manufacture quite as ludicrous a compounding of the size and number of those accounts as others [i]  have done. More precisely, the issue they raise is that smaller retirement plan balances can, and often are, legally expunged from the plan of their prior employer into an IRA.   Now, retirement plan professionals know how this works — those who sever (or who are severed from) employment with less than a $1,000 balance will likely have that distributed to them in cash, those with balances above $7,000 [ii]  will generally have the option to leave that bal...

Thanksgiving has been called a “uniquely American” holiday — and as we approach the holiday season, it seems appropriate to take a moment to reflect upon, and acknowledge — to give thanks, if you will. Indeed, even amidst all of the strife and turmoil in our world, there remains much for which we can all be thankful. And in this, my third year of “retirement” — well, my list seems even longer. I’m once again thankful that so many employers (still) voluntarily choose to offer a workplace retirement plan — and, particularly in these extraordinary times, that so many have remained committed to that promise. I’m hopeful that the incentives in SECURE and SECURE 2.0 will continue to spur more to provide that opportunity — and encouraged by the current rate of adoptions. I’m thankful that so many workers, given an opportunity to participate in these programs, (still) do. And that, under new provisions in SECURE 2.0, those who gain new access to those programs will be automatically enrolled. I...

  Some months back, the Labor Department published an intriguing three-part “proposed rule” that, to my eye, offered helpful fiduciary tips that go well beyond pooled employer plans (PEPs). The title alone — “ Pooled Employer Plans: Big Plans for Small Businesses ” — told you all you needed to know about the motives behind the publication. And, true to form, both the data provided on the current state of pooled employer plan adoption and the focus of the request for information (RFI) included were very much in the spirit of removing barriers to PEP adoption, if not outright promotion of the same. But what I viewed as the third part of the publication (though it’s labeled V. Fiduciary Tips for Small Employers Selecting a PEP) was, to my eye, the most intriguing aspect, in no small part because it served as a valuable reminder that there ARE fiduciary considerations in making that choice — something that purveyors of that option have been known to gloss over. As I was recently scann...