Nevin's Data "Points"

“You better watch out, you better not cry, you better not pout…” Those are, of course, the opening lyrics to that holiday classic, “Santa Claus is Coming to Town.” And while the tune is jaunty enough, the message—that there’s some kind of elfin “eye in the sky” keeping tabs on us has always struck me as just a little bit… creepy. That said, once upon a time, as Christmas neared, it was not uncommon for my wife and I to caution our occasionally misbehaving brood that  they  had best be attentive to how their (not uncommon) misbehaviors might be viewed by the big guy at the North Pole. In support of that notion, a few years back—well, now it’s quite a few years back—when my kids still believed in the (SPOILER ALERT) reality of Santa Claus, we discovered an ingenious website [i]  that purported to offer a real-time assessment of their “naughty or nice” status. Indeed, no amount of parental threats or admonishments—in fact, nothing we ever said or did— ever  managed to have

As human beings, we’re often motivated to seek simpler solutions to life’s challenges. But sometimes “simpler”… isn’t.  While there are some amazing bundled solutions, ERISA’s admonition to act solely in the interests of plan participants (and beneficiaries), alongside the requirement that those be reasonable in terms of cost and value, call for a careful and considered evaluation.  In that vein, there are some “myths” that seem to be prevalent regarding those choices, perceptions that persist even today. Here are some points to consider: An unbundled approach is more expensive. The reality is, it can be—depending on the point of comparison. If all other things are “equal,” then certainly engaging another level of service and compliance oversight can bring with it additional costs. Then again, engaging the services of a third-party administrator [i]  (TPA)—at least the right TPA—is hardly an “all other things equal” comparison. Their involvement and engagement may well

There’s nothing like the NAPA 401(k) Summit—particularly being  at  the NAPA 401(k) Summit after the many months and a worldwide pandemic that kept us all apart.  Each year for the past four years we’ve taken advantage of that gathering (including in 2020 when we gathered “virtually”) to reach out [i]  to the nation’s top retirement plan advisors to glean their perspective on a wide range of issues relating to their practice—and practices.  This year’s  Summit Insider  was no exception—as we “consulted” with more than 500 retirement plan advisors and home office staff on a range of issues—the criteria in selecting—and rejecting—key business relationships, the things that are over-hyped—and the things that no one is talking about—but that everyone, at least in the eyes of these “Insiders,” should be. We also got some insights on retirement income, important features in choosing target-date funds, rollovers and outcomes.  We’ve included a number of verbatim comments on what t

 A recent white paper has garnered a lot of discussion by casting “shade” on a traditional premise about retirement plan withdrawals. The premise—a so-called “rule of thumb [i] ”—isn’t all that old, actually; it dates back only to 1994, when financial planner William Bengen [ii]  claimed that over every rolling 30-year time horizon since 1926, retirees holding a portfolio that consisted 50% of stocks and 50% of fixed-income securities could have safely withdrawn an annual amount equal to 4% of their original assets, adjusted for inflation without… running out of money.  That said, even though it was predicated on a number of assumptions that might not be true in the real world—a 30-year withdrawal period, a 50/50 portfolio mix of stocks and bonds, assumptions about inflation—oh, and a schedule of withdrawals unaltered by life’s changing circumstances (not to mention a 90% probability of success)—a recent Morningstar  paper  challenged its conclusions in view of “current c

While it’s the celebration following a successful harvest held by the Pilgrims and members of the Wampanoag tribe in 1621 that provides most of the imagery around the holiday, Thanksgiving didn’t become a national observance until much later. Incredibly, it wasn’t marked as a national observance until 1863—right in the middle of the Civil War, and at a time when, arguably, there was little for which to be thankful. Indeed, President Abraham Lincoln, in his  proclamation  regarding the observance, called on all Americans to ask God to “commend to his tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife” and to “heal the wounds of the nation.”  We could surely stand to have some of that today.    Thanksgiving has been called a “uniquely American” holiday—and so, even in a year in which there has been what seems to be an unprecedented amount of disruption, frustration, stress, discomfort and loss—there remains

 What’s the most used and least understood/appreciated acronym in the retirement plan industry? Well, for my money, it’s “TPA”—short for “third-party administrator.” It’s a term that is widely bandied about, but I think misunderstood by many. The origins are plain enough—“administrator” in the sense that a TPA deals with plan administration process and issues. The issues and process, it bears noting, that ERISA (not to mention the IRS and DOL) presumes are the responsibility of the plan fiduciary. We’re talking about things like ensuring that the terms of the plan document are adhered to, that non-discrimination tests are properly applied, and that contributions are timely deposited.  Where things seem to get confused is the “third party” reference. At its simplest, it’s merely an acknowledgement that the entity performing those vital plan administration functions is someone other than the entity responsible under the law. They are, quite simply, a party external to th

Several years ago, we had in mind that it would be fun to get an aquarium for our home, and (even) I got excited at the prospects of filling it with a variety of all kinds and sizes of exotic fish.  Sadly, those hopes were dashed when I discovered that , despite the massive displays of what appeared to be whole schools of fish in similarly sized tanks at the pet store, our specific-sized tank would only support a handful of the fish I had hoped to display. Apparently, the more fish you want to have (that live), the bigger the tank you need. The reason: they need room to thrive and grow. At long last the IRS  last week  announced the new contribution and benefit limits for 2022. Considering the run-up in inflation this year, expectations were similarly high for increases in those limits. And sure enough, among other things, the 401(k) limit was bumped $1,000 (to $20,500) and the defined benefit plan limit rose from $230,000 to $245,000, though the limit for catch-up cont

I recently stumbled across a provocative article in the  New York Times  with that intriguing headline. Honestly, I laughed out loud (drawing my wife’s quizzical attention on an otherwise quiet Saturday morning) when I read it. I’m a (proud) Boomer, of course, and while Gen X basically slipped quietly into the workplace (much to their frustration), Millennials (to my experience) landed with a bang, upending traditional norms of business and meeting etiquette, demanding a voice that seemed well beyond their experience (and, yes, sometimes knowledge)—and, frustratingly (certainly for those of us who played by a different set of rules at their age), getting it.  So the notion that they were now feeling the same kind of pressures from the  next  generation of workers (a.k.a. Gen Z) was somewhat humorous to me in a “so, how do  you  like it?” kind of way.   Yes, having lived through the not-so-subtle eye-rolling of younger co-workers (and the more recent dismissive “OK, Boomer

Halloween is the time of year when one’s thoughts turn to trick-or-treat, ghosts and goblins, and things that go bump in the night—and, for plan sponsors, and those who support them, a good time to think about the things that give us pause—that cause a chill to run down our spine…  Things like… Changing Providers OK, they may not exactly be “scared” of changing providers, but it’s certainly not a process for the faint of heart—particularly with all of the competing focus priorities confronting plan sponsors on a daily basis. Industry surveys routinely point to a certain amount of regular provider “churn”—indeed, by some counts as many as 10% of the plans change providers in any given year. That said, industry surveys (and excessive fee litigation) are replete with indications that the vast majority of plans not only don’t change recordkeepers, but may not even undertake a formal review of services, fees and capabilities. Now, any plan sponsor who has ever gone throug

It’s ironic that programs designed to provide retirement income pay so little attention to the realization of that objective. That’s right—for the vast majority of participants today, creating that “paycheck for the rest of your life” remains a DIY undertaking. To this day only about half of defined contribution plans currently provide an option for participants to establish a systematic series of periodic payments, much less an annuity or other in-plan retirement income option.  However, the need for that solution is widely acknowledged—and there are some new, if somewhat familiar, solutions emerging.  Earlier this month, BlackRock garnered some  headlines  with news that not only was it building annuity contracts into a target-date fund series, but also that it had already lined up five large plan sponsors (with some $7.5 billion in assets) to implement the option as a default. That followed by a few months the March  announcement  of a consortium of providers (Ameri

A great resource to help you grow and expand your business could be right under your nose… Are you spending time you don’t have trying to work out problems you didn’t create? Let’s face it—good service, or the lack thereof, is widely cited as the most common reason that plan sponsors change providers—and that can affect your relationship as well. Sometimes you chose those providers, other times you inherit them.  Regardless, every plan has someone in charge of administration and compliance—a third party, if you will, so called because they perform functions that plan sponsors are expected to ensure are performed (and once upon a simpler time many did so themselves). Whether you engaged those services, or find yourself tasked with overseeing them, you know they can be the difference between a smooth-running plan and one that constantly teeters on the brink of blowing up. Wouldn’t it be nice if you could partner with this “third party” administrator to take some of the bur

 Sometimes the motivations of those attacking the 401(k) are pretty obvious. The most recent was an article by a Maurie Backman at the Motley Fool titled, “ Why a 401(k) isn’t the wonderful savings tool you think it is. ” I tried to ignore it when it first (to my eyes) appeared on Forbes (which seems to have a pretty low threshold for contributions these days), and I was no more inclined to read it when it showed up a couple of days later on Fox News. But then folks started sharing it on both LinkedIn and Twitter—some ostensibly to hold it up for ridicule, [i]  others as an affirmation—and, with some reluctance, I finally clicked on the article.  Oddly, considering the title (and, in fairness, editors  have  been known to tweak headlines such that they bear little resemblance to the article they are attached to), the article spent almost as much space outlining the virtues of the 401(k)—specifically that they are “easier to sign up for” than an IRA, and that they have (much

There is frequently a difference between doing what the law requires and doing everything that you could do as a plan fiduciary. That said, there are things that plan fiduciaries must do—and things that, while not required, can keep the plan, and plan fiduciaries out of trouble. Let’s get started. 1. Not having a plan/plan investment committee ERISA only requires that the named fiduciary (and there must be one of those) make decisions regarding the plan that are in the best interests of plan participants and beneficiaries, and that are the types of decisions that a prudent expert would make about such matters. ERISA does not require that you make those decisions by yourself—and, in fact, requires that, if you lack the requisite expertise, you enlist the support of those who do have it.  You may well possess the requisite expertise to make those decisions—and then again, you may not. But even if you do, why forego the assistance of other perspectives? However, havin

While the past 18 months have often felt like we’re living through an episode of  The Twilight Zone —never more so that to realize that this week marks the 20 th  anniversary of the September 11 attacks.  It’s hard to believe that there are today people in college—and in the workforce –that weren’t even alive on that most horrific of days. In fact, it’s been labeled a defining event for Millennials—a date marker between those who were alive on that date and those (Generation Z) who weren’t. That said, the passage of time has surely dimmed the memory for many who did live through it. More’s the pity. Early on that bright Tuesday morning in 2001, I was in the middle of a cross-country flight, literally running from one terminal to another in Dallas, when my cellphone rang. I was annoyed—the hour was early, my flight in had been late, and the bugger between that and the next uncomfortably short—particularly for a flight that was in another terminal.   It was my wife—I assum

 A recent survey of insurers highlights the criteria that a number of the nation’s leading fiduciary liability insurers identified as the biggest sources of fiduciary risk—within the control of plan fiduciaries.  Now, arguably, the report—titled “ What Drives Fiduciary Liability? ”—might have been more accurately titled “What Drives Fiduciary Liability Insurance Costs?”—or even more precisely “What Drives Fiduciary Liability Insurance Costs That You Can Do Something About?” Indeed, the report’s authors note that it was specifically focused on sources of risk that are within the control of fiduciaries. That’s key, because there  are  things that attract litigation (such as plan size or even stock price) that aren’t.  Moreover, the survey respondents (there were 8 of the 12 that Aon said account for 85% of the total gross written premium placed by the firms in 2020) were asked only to evaluate pricing criteria as having a significant, small or nonexistent impact—though one

I was recently taken to task for last week’s column about retirement savings regrets. More precisely, my column about the regrets expressed in a recent American Century survey drew the attention of Faith Teope in a LinkedIn post titled, “ Dear Finance Experts: We Would Listen, But We Don't Care .” In fairness, it wasn’t so much my  column  (“boring but true”), or even the American Century survey’s  findings  that came in for criticism, but more the head-scratching that the survey set off among financial professionals (including, I suppose this one) as to why people aren’t paying more attention to things like… saving for retirement. Her premise—that we’re using language that doesn’t resonate with those we hope to motivate—is, frankly, unassailable.  In fact, it’s a topic I broached (at least at a high level) earlier this year in a post titled, “ Is it Time to Retire Retirement? ” As I noted then, for all but the most financially astute, trading off a here-and-now need (or