Nevin's Data "Points"

I’ve long relished telling “newbies” to the retirement space that ERISA was the   second   big executive act of then-newly enshrined President Gerald R. Ford—less than one month after he took office.  In fairness—and I’m not exactly a kid—I was barely out of high school when that event occurred.  I’ve never had a benefits program (retirement OR healthcare, and us retirement geeks tend to forget that ERISA also has sway over workplace health plans) that wasn’t operating under its auspices—and so, talking about what ERISA has done/changed requires going back before my personal experience. And yet, despite the disparaging acronym “Every Ridiculous Idea Since Adam,” what ERISA has accomplished—and what has emerged in its aftermath—seems truly remarkable to me.  ERISA is, of course, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974—and on Labor Day 2024, that legislation will be 50 years young. Not that ERISA created either the concept or the reality of pensions an...

Pensions were not on my mind in 1974, certainly not on Labor Day of that year.  While I was pondering my new college textbooks (and trying to figure out how I was going to pay for $.55/gallon gasoline), President Gerald R. Ford, less than a month in that role—and, appropriately enough on Labor Day, signed into law the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974—better known to most of us as ERISA. Little did I know at the time that that law—and the structure it provided to the nation’s private pension system—would, in the years to follow, play such an integral role in my life. And yet, in a wide variety of positions, and a handful of different organizations and locations, from that first college internship in 1977 to—well, today—retirement has been my career. ERISA did not create pensions, of course; they existed in significant numbers prior to 1974. A major motivation for ERISA was the termination of the Studebaker [i] pension plan for its hourly workers in 19...

What’s the most important number when it comes to retirement? Once upon a time it might have been considered to be “65”—that traditional age for retirement—but even though it’s the default in many retirement calculators, until recently it hadn’t even been the most common age for actual retirement. Heck, it’s not even “good enough” for full Social Security benefits these days. [i]   Perhaps a more precise focus number in retirement planning is the one that purports to provide some level of financial security in retirement [ii] —indeed, some years back there was a commercial that prompted folks to determine their “number”—a reference to a financial result that was deemed necessary to “retire the way you want” (and perhaps when you want, though that wasn’t part of the “pitch”). But while that was (and is) “A” number, in order to get to it, for it to have any semblance of actually fulfilling that promise (premise?), you had to first get to several other numbers; how l...