Nevin's Data "Points"

Perhaps because of the recent full moon, the nation’s 401(k) “haters” were out in force. Yes, last week we were “treated” to a  Bloomberg op-ed  with ideas on how to “fix” America’s broken retirement savings system, a back-handed compliment (of sorts) on SECURE 2.0 in  Forbes  from Teresa Ghilarducci, and the trifecta was completed with an academics op-ed in the  Washington Post  alleging that the current retirement system is “built for the rich.”  Most of the criticism was focused on the same old myopic view on taxes and tax preferences—all flavored through the prism of a highly biased preference for the involvement of the federal government in such matters, rather than the private sector. Key Points So, let me take a couple of minutes to make a few points that always seem to be glossed over: Tax deferral is not tax avoidance. Those contributions and earnings will be taxed (though generally outside the 10-year budget scoring window Congress uses). The ability to save for

 One of  my  favorite holiday movies is “Planes, Trains, & Automobiles”—but who thought so many would have to live it?  The movie I’m referring to is that 1987 John Hughes classic starring Steve Martin and John Candy as a pair of travelers (Martin an advertising exec, Candy a travelling shower curtain ring salesman—and you think  you  have a hard job) trying to get home for Thanksgiving. There are any number of misadventures along the way—involving the aforementioned means of transportation on the trip from New York to Chicago… via Wichita and St. Louis.  Well, a couple of weeks back several hundred advisors found themselves reliving that experience as a series of unrelated events emerged to thwart their scheduled travel to the NAPA 401(k) Summit in Tampa. It started early the day before the event with a strike by Alaska Airlines pilots, by mid-morning  Southwest Airlines  was experiencing ““intermittent performance issues following routine overnight maintenance of s

Thanks to their mother, my kids have grown up with a variety of pets in our house—but none more bizarre than our experience with… a chicken. My son’s elementary school class had been exposed to the miracle of life over the course of several weeks by watching a set of chicks spring forth from eggs that had been carefully tended by the class. Once hatched and ready to be turned loose, the teacher offered to let selected children take one home—provided they obtained their parent’s permission, of course. My son was smart enough to ask his mother—who, seeing how much it meant to him—and much to my amazement, acquiesced to the request.  And so “Grr” [i]  entered our lives. Mind you, we were living in a residential neighborhood in Connecticut at the time, miles and miles from anything remotely resembling a farm. That said, the little peeping chick was adorable, and my wife persuaded me that, as the chick grew we’d be able to erect a small pen in the back yard. We even joked ab

 Years back I remember being part of a Q&A with a group of plan sponsors—the focus was the challenge of not only getting, but keeping their plans in compliance, while also looking for creative ways to engage and encourage participants. Then at one point, a tired looking gentleman, expressing frustration with the pressures of audits and litigation, said: “I wish the DOL would just tell us what to do.”  I cautioned him at the time that he ought to be careful what he wished for—that he might just get it. Sure enough, in mid-March the Labor Department issued a “compliance assistance release” which was unique both in format and, arguably, focus. It reminded plan fiduciaries of the significance of their review and assessment of prudence of plan investments—and then said in no uncertain terms that it had concerns about the ability of cryptocurrency to meet those high standards. Indeed, the release plainly stated that those who did include such options could “expect to be que