Nevin's Data "Points"

  A new study shows how a proposed government-run retirement program said to increase coverage could actually undermine the nation’s retirement readiness. The  report  — by Morningstar’s Spencer Look and Jack VanDerhei (yes, that Jack VanDerhei) — considers the potential effects of the Retirement Savings for Americans Act (RSAA) on retirement-income adequacy for Generation Z and millennial workers. The  proposed legislation  — which aims to expand retirement coverage for American workers by creating a federal retirement plan for those not covered through their employer — has been introduced in both the House and the Senate. [i]   The legislation has been positioned as a means of helping close the coverage gap — of creating not only an opportunity for those without access to a retirement plan at work to save for retirement, but to receive the incentive of a matching contribution from the federal government. How then, would such a proposal undermine the natio...

 There’s nothing like a global pandemic to fuel interest in, if not the need for, emergency savings. Indeed, there are a half dozen provisions [i] in the new SECURE 2.0 designed to make it easier for workers to tap into their retirement savings—two aimed specifically at emergency savings. Though the financial impact of the pandemic (not to mention a series of natural disasters) has arguably been uneven, a report from Vanguard [ii] highlighted the longer-term impacts of the economic slowdown and inflation’s growing bite of the household budget. It's also widely acknowledged that concerns about the inability to fund an unexpected financial emergency is a source of stress for workers, undermining financial wellness.    All that said, well before COVID-19, there have been concerns about Americans’ lack of emergency savings [iii] and, perhaps more broadly, that they were using their retirement savings accounts as that resource. Behavioral finance-types have ...