Mark Your Calendars!

Social media routinely reminds me that I’m teetering on the brink of overlooking key remembrances—days in the year to honor sons, daughters, puppies, dogs, kittens, and…well, you name it. And we have whole months set aside to acknowledge the contributions of women, black history, and Hispanic heritage—but there’s another you might have missed…

As it turns out, October is National Retirement Security Month—a “national effort to raise public awareness about the importance of saving for retirement.” More specifically, to provide an opportunity for employees to reflect on their personal retirement goals and determine if they're on target to reach those goals—and for those who work with those employees to help them do so.

Now, while the need isn’t new, the calendar acknowledgement is, at least relatively so. The notion was raised in 2006 by then-Sens. Gordon Smith (R-OR) and Kent Conrad (D-ND)—though at that time it was “just” a week. However, in 2020, the National Association of Government Defined Contribution Administrators took it even further and updated its legislative priority to advocate to change it to National Retirement Security Month, instead of only the week.  

That said—and despite the hard work, talented designs, and sponsorship of a number of large and reputable financial services organizations, I suspect many of you haven’t even heard of it. More’s the pity.

Key Objectives

Traditionally, the week is focused on three key objectives:

  • making employees more aware of how critical it is to save now for their financial future;
  • promoting the benefits of getting started saving for retirement today; and
  • encouraging employees to take full advantage of their employer-sponsored plans by increasing their contributions.

Now, if you’re reading this (and you are, aren’t you?), odds are that you’re all too aware of the challenges that confront our nation’s retirement savings system. I’d go so far as to wager that just about everybody taking the time to read this post thinks about those items every working day, and doubtless spends a good part of their week trying to advance those causes—so, what’s the point of a month devoted to that emphasis?

What If?

The point, of course, is not for us—but for those who don’t have these issues on their mind every day. Because, even if we should be thinking about this every day of the year, special “events” like National Retirement Security Month give those of us who do a chance to, as a collective group of professionals, remind those who don’t of the importance of thoughtful preparations for retirement.

Better still, with the plan design improvements available today, you might only need one week—or one hour—of getting an individual—or group of individuals—to think about those messages.

Consider, for example, what if that period of focus got an individual (or, better still, a group of individuals) to enroll in their workplace retirement plan? What if it led an employer to embrace automatic enrollment, or, for those who are already enrolled, to increase the default contribution rate, or to reenroll those who have opted out of participation in the past? What if that focus prompted those who are already participating to increase their deferral rate (on their own), or to boost that rate so that they got the full benefit of the employer match? And what if that period of focus—or the actions above—led workers to stop and actually figure out how much they might need to save to sustain their retirement?

What if, indeed? 

- Nevin E. Adams, JD

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do Roth and 401(k) Pre-Tax Holders Really Spend Differently?

Image
An interesting—and somewhat counterintuitive—report came out last week, one that cast doubt on the “common wisdom” regarding Roth versus traditional pre-tax savings. The assumption underlying the research [i] was that those who had not yet paid taxes on their savings (the traditional pre-tax savings) would be hesitant to tap into those savings and trigger taxes, certainly more so that individuals that had already paid those taxes. Instead, the research suggested that the opposite occurred; that individuals who had saved on a pre-tax basis actually withdrew more/sooner—but with a twist.  This they hailed as good news. They noted that the research suggests investing in a CT (current-taxed, or Roth) plan could help ease concerns about outliving funds—because they spend at a lower rate (though they saw this as a negative for those who saved on a deferred tax (DT) basis).  They even managed to find a silver lining in the “cloud” of faster spending by the pre-tax crowd beca
Read more

Is the 401(k) Really a ‘Horrible’ Retirement Plan?

Image
  A recent “news” post about a blog post finds some curious “faults” with the 401(k). The news item carried the provocative title “ ‘Rich Dad’ Robert Kiyosaki Reveals Why the 401(k) Is a ‘Horrible’ Retirement Plan .” It originally ran on GoBankingRates.com, but was subsequently picked up in syndication on Yahoo Finance (at least). For the uninitiated, Robert Kiyosaki is one of those “I’ll help you get rich the way I did” types, providing that road map via books (notably “Rich Dad, Poor Dad”) and seminars. He offers comparisons to decisions made by his dad (poor dad) in contrast to those of the father of his best friend (rich dad).  Suffice it to say that his dad worked hard and saved the old-fashioned way—which is NOT his advice to you. That’s included previous pearls of wisdom like “ Why Saving Money is the Wrong Way to Prepare for Retirement .” Apparently rather than saving for retirement, we’re supposed to “look for an investment that will pay for your desired standard of living. Ma
Read more

Shifting the 401(k) ‘Balance’?

Image
A week or so ago, I came across an announcement that IBM was making changes to its 401(k). More specifically that, effective next year they were going to replace their matching contribution in their 401(k) with an employer contribution to a cash balance plan. [i] In the days that followed, the news was picked up in a couple of different trade publications—the implication being that this might be signs of a new shift in plan design. Heck, even Teresa Ghilarducci weighed in , championing the “evolution” to a defined benefit structure from the “flawed” 401(k). She never misses an “opportunity.” Readers here are likely familiar with the basic concepts of a cash balance design. Technically a defined benefit plan, it’s generally referred to as a “hybrid” because it also has a number of participant-friendly aspects that it shares with a defined contribution plan, notably an account balance (though it’s a “notional” one) that is shared with participants. The benefits accumulate
Read more